Revista-SCLECARTO-Nº1-2019 - Flipbook - Página 52
Prótesis de superÞcie (PS). Pasado. Presente. ¿Futuro?
20. Jamesson SS, Langton DJ, Natu S, Nargol TV. The inßuence of
age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an
independent center analysis. J Arthroplasty, 2008; 23 (suppl.
1):50-55.
21. Shimmin Aj, Back DL. Femoral neck fractures associated with hip
resurfacing; a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br),
2005; 87-B:463-464
22. Cossey Aj, Back DL, Shimmin A, Young D, Spriggins AJ. The nonoperative management of periprothesic fractures associated with
the Birrningham hip resurfacing procedure. J Arthroplasty, 2005;
20:358-361.
23. Rieker CB, Schiin R, Honrad R, Liebentritt G, Gnepf P, Shen M, et al.
Inßuencia del espacio articular en la tribología de la articulación
metal-metal de gran calibre de las prótesis de recubrimiento
de cadera. Revisión de las artroplastias de recubrimiento de la
cadera. Orthopedics Clinics of North America (edición española),
2005; 5:161-170.
24. P.J. Firkins, J.L. Tipper, M.R. Saadatzadeh, M.H. Stone, R. Farrar, et
al. Quantitative análisis of wear and wear debrise from Metal on
Metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator.
Biomed Mater Eng., 11 (2001), pp 143-157
25. I. Leslie, S. Williams, C. Brown, G. Isaac, Z. Jin, E. Ingham et al. Effect
of bearing size on the long-term wear, wear debris, and ion levels
of large diameter metal on metal Hip replacement: an in vitro
study. J. Biomed Mater Re B Appl Biomater., 87 (2008),pp.:163-172
26. X. Gallart, O. Marín. Información y asesoramiento para cirujanos
ortopédicos: árbol de decisiones ante un pacente portador
de prótesis con par de fricción metal-metal. Rev Esp Cir Ortop
Traum., 55 (2011) pp 67-69
27. T. Schmalzried, V. Tiberi. Metal-Metal reactivity: Houston, we have
a problem. Orthopedics., 33 (2010) pp 647
28. P.E Beaulé. A survey on the prevalence of Pseudotumours with
metal on metal hip resurfacing in Canadian Academic Centers.
JBJS-ScientiÞc Articles: 04 May 2011-93-2-p 118-121
29. Bissohop R et al. High prevalence of pseudotumours in patients
with a BHR Prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surgery - ScientiÞc Articels:
4/9/2013-Vol. 95-17-p. 1554-1560
30. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young O, Shimmin A. Early results of primary
Birrningham hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2005; 87B:324-329.
31. S. Krüger, P.T. Zambelli, P.F. Leyvaz, B.M Jolles. Computerassisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty:
improvement in accuracy?. Int Orthop., 33 (2009),pp. 27-33
32. J.P. Cobb, V. Kannan, K. Brust, G. Therendan. Navigation reduces
the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Clin
Orthop Relat Res., 463 (2007),pp 90-97
33. X. Gallart, J.A. Fernández-Valencia, J. Riba, G. Bori, S. García,
S. Carrillo. Alignament guided by computer navigation of the
femoral component in hip resurfacing. Hip Int., 20 (2010),pp 43-47
34. A. Alvarez Romera, E. González y V. Teruel. Artroplastia de
recubrimiento. Monografías AAOS-SECOT Nº 2. 2008, pág.:25-37
35. C.W. Mc Bryde, K. Theivendran, A. Thomas, R. Treacy, P.B. Pynsent.
The inßuence of head size and sex on the outcome of BHR. JBJS
2010 Jan;92(1):105
36. G.S. Matharu, A. Judge; D. Murray, H. Pandit. Prevalence of and
risk factors for hip resurfacing revisión. JBJS 2016 Sep 7;98(17):
1444
52 - Revista Sclecarto- N.º 1 - Año 2019
